A New Day
After the recent rejection of President Bush's NSA wire-tapping bill, some conservatives (and liberals alike) are asking, "What's going on?" A Michigan judge ruled the bill "unconstitutional and invasive". Unconstitutional? Probably. Invasive? Absolutely. We are living in trecherous times, one in which terrorists claw and scratch, trying to make some parts of the world a living hell (and doing an excellent job). London bombings, Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building, World Trade Center (x2), Madrid bombings, constant attacks in Isreal, and hundreds
more terrorist attacks have been committed in last decade alone. What are we, as the strongest, most technologically-capable powerhouse in the world doing about it? Very little. Our own courts won't let us. The times have changed since 1787. It is a new day, one that may not adhere to the constitution, but certainly does not oppose the core of it's message: defend the American people at all costs.
Now, on to another topic. I get a kick out the radical left-wing democrats who seem to oppose Bush on anything and everything, even profiling. Our President isn't perfect, but this time he's right on the money. Profiling is an absolute must. We cannot continue on this anti-terrorist bit without it. I wish it could stop there...oh, how I wish. But it doesn't. There's always some super-political nut looking for his five minutes of fame, calling Bush's Terror Profiling, "Racial" Profiling.
It's not racial profiling! Most of the recent terror activities have been perpetuated by young Muslim men. So, what do we do? We check young Muslim men with more scrutiny than the 80 year old women in a motorized carts. It just makes sense. So, let's drop the racism bit, and focus on the problem. I believe that most Muslim-Americans feel the way I do. They understand that some of their co-religionists are remorseless killers. But obviously not all Muslims think that way, and certainly the ACLU and other far-left groups oppose profiling. They fight hard against most strategies designed to make terror attacks more difficult. Except, of course, when it involves them.
Here's what it all comes down to: Some American's live in the real world, and some live in Never Never Land. Those who live in this theoretical zone believe all problems can be solved if only we talked things over with those who want to kill us. For those people, actions like profiling, unilateral military campaigns, and tough interrogation methods are simply too drastic. Looking back, the actions of Presidents Clinton and Bush in his first year pretty much ignored the growing terror threat from the Muslim world. Little aggressive action was taken against al Qaeda when it blew up our Embassies in Africa and attacked our battleship off the coast of Yemen. On September 11th, there was no airline profiling when 19 Muslim murderers boarded
three planes, all with their one-way tickets to hell. Had we been wiser, many would still be alive today. But we were not wise then, and are not wise now. Say what you will, but lay off Granny at the airport and zero in on higer risk subjects.
more terrorist attacks have been committed in last decade alone. What are we, as the strongest, most technologically-capable powerhouse in the world doing about it? Very little. Our own courts won't let us. The times have changed since 1787. It is a new day, one that may not adhere to the constitution, but certainly does not oppose the core of it's message: defend the American people at all costs.
Now, on to another topic. I get a kick out the radical left-wing democrats who seem to oppose Bush on anything and everything, even profiling. Our President isn't perfect, but this time he's right on the money. Profiling is an absolute must. We cannot continue on this anti-terrorist bit without it. I wish it could stop there...oh, how I wish. But it doesn't. There's always some super-political nut looking for his five minutes of fame, calling Bush's Terror Profiling, "Racial" Profiling.
It's not racial profiling! Most of the recent terror activities have been perpetuated by young Muslim men. So, what do we do? We check young Muslim men with more scrutiny than the 80 year old women in a motorized carts. It just makes sense. So, let's drop the racism bit, and focus on the problem. I believe that most Muslim-Americans feel the way I do. They understand that some of their co-religionists are remorseless killers. But obviously not all Muslims think that way, and certainly the ACLU and other far-left groups oppose profiling. They fight hard against most strategies designed to make terror attacks more difficult. Except, of course, when it involves them.
Here's what it all comes down to: Some American's live in the real world, and some live in Never Never Land. Those who live in this theoretical zone believe all problems can be solved if only we talked things over with those who want to kill us. For those people, actions like profiling, unilateral military campaigns, and tough interrogation methods are simply too drastic. Looking back, the actions of Presidents Clinton and Bush in his first year pretty much ignored the growing terror threat from the Muslim world. Little aggressive action was taken against al Qaeda when it blew up our Embassies in Africa and attacked our battleship off the coast of Yemen. On September 11th, there was no airline profiling when 19 Muslim murderers boarded
three planes, all with their one-way tickets to hell. Had we been wiser, many would still be alive today. But we were not wise then, and are not wise now. Say what you will, but lay off Granny at the airport and zero in on higer risk subjects.
